ICT4D, ICTD, or what?

I’ve been re-thinking “ICT4D” and “ICTD” recently, and increasingly coming to the conclusion that I should avoid these terms in reference to the work CIS does in favor of something like “underserved communities and low resource environments” or other descriptor that avoids these acronyms.

One of the problems with “ICT4D” is that it connotes different things to different people – with most definitions swirling around the application of (primarily digital) ICT to interventions that have an explicit developmental goal such as health, education, government transparency, or others of the sort found in the MDGs. As such, there is a tendency to ignore issues that do not correspond to the conventional development goals (quality of life, games, social movements, etc.), or what might be simply described as any use of ICT in a developing world context. This was brought home recently when Joyojeet Pal mentioned that the paper he submitted to ICTD2009 on depictions of computers in popular Indian cinema was critiqued for not being within scope. To me, it is incredibly relevant to understand how the computer has become a symbol of aspiration within a society, how that symbol has changed over time, is the computer used for good or ill, what effect this has on people’s views of technology’s promise or pitfalls, and so on. In order to accommodate a broader scope many people have turned to the term “ICTD,” or ICT and development, to place the emphasis on the phenomenon of ICT use in developing countries, irrespective of whether there is a “developmental” goal or not. Despite the good intentions behind this I’m afraid the nuance is lost on most people so I don’t think it serves our community long term. And, I hate acronyms.

There are other problems too – such as what constitutes “development” and is it meaningful to continue to lump countries into developing or developed buckets (I think not) – but these are topics for another day.

All of this is also fueled by continuing discussions about whether ICTD is a field, or if there is a field, what would it be called. This has been debated on the community informatics list among others. A number of us will be taking this up at an ICTD Curriculum Workshop at Doha. Looking forward to it, though rather than hold my breath waiting for a critical mass to emerge I think I’ll simply describe CIS’s work in plain language.

About these ads

14 Responses

  1. Hey Chris, some minor comments form me on this, as it’s a topic of interest as you know :)

    http://eldermusings.blogspot.com/

    Have fun in Doha!

  2. [...] Coward puts it this way: In order to accommodate a broader scope many people have turned to the term “ICTD,” or ICT and [...]

  3. [...] ICT4Ds from the general conversation of ICTs? Chris Coward in his blog, second recess, makes a good point that not all technologies aimed at the developing world have to do with capital-D development. One [...]

  4. “In order to accommodate a broader scope many people have turned to the term “ICTD,” or ICT and development, to place the emphasis on the phenomenon of ICT use in developing countries, irrespective of whether there is a “developmental” goal or not. Despite the good intentions behind this I’m afraid the nuance is lost on most people so I don’t think it serves our community long term.”
    -I am a research student in Computational Linguistics and have been interested in ICTD for sometime now. However, as I continue for search for more ICT in ICTD…I find more and more D…and sometimes more and more ICT irrespective of D. I can connect to what you have just said.

    I would love to know the works related to the real ICT-4-D in the most literal sense possible…. I,C,T 4 D.

  5. Hello, great suggestion and an exciting article post,
    it is going to be fascinating if this is still the situation in a few years time

  6. Fantastic short article, I loved the earpiece quiet on iphone 5 bit

  7. Very exciting object

  8. Wonderful Article

  9. I very rarely discuss these articles, but I assumed this on deserved a
    big thankyou

  10. I hardly ever discuss these items, but I thought this on deserved a well done you

  11. Extremely fascinating short article

  12. Brilliant critique, I enjoyed the la crosse technology wireless weather station bit

  13. I very rarely comment on these articles, but I assumed
    this on deserved a big thankyou

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: